A Surprise To Be Sure, But A Welcome One. The Cloverfield Paradox (2018) Review

Anyone who’s read my blog from the beginning will know that I love the first Cloverfield. I also loved 10 Cloverfield Lane despite it not being what I expected. So it shouldn’t come as a surprise that when The Cloverfield Paradox appeared on Netflix last February, I was ecstatic. While it may lack the well-written characters of the previous two films, The Cloverfield Paradox provides a compelling plot in a mysterious and eerie world similar in fashion to its predecessors.

This third instalment in what is now an anthology series centres around the crew of a space station working on a particle accelerator. They hope that the machine will create new energy as the world below is tearing itself apart for resources. Following a test of the accelerator, the crew suddenly finds that the Earth is gone. The station has been teleported to some unknown area of space. As they try to find a way to return home, reality begins to shift and distort, making everything unclear and uncertain.

the cloverfield paradox pic
Was so surprised it made me to quote The Phantom Menace.

The Setting, Plot and Horror

The Cloverfield Paradox has a vibe similar to that of 10 Cloverfield Lane in that its story concerns a worldwide struggle yet it is depicted only through the eyes of a few characters in small, isolated settings. In The Cloverfield Paradox the main setting is of course the space station but we occasionally go down to Earth with Michael, the husband of one of the scientists, where most of his scenes are restricted to just his home. These grounded settings create tension as while we see how international catastrophes affects the main characters, we never see or are made certain of the disasters themselves, especially the ones that occur in the film.

Even though the main setting (the space station) is restrictive, The Cloverfield Paradox still manages to provide a compelling plot teeming with sci-fi ideas. With the premise concerning particle accelerators, space time and other universes, the film feels like a big budget episode of Doctor Who or The Twilight Zone. After the crew find themselves in the middle of nowhere, strange and bizarre incidents occur on the station. This is where the film’s horror comes from as the incidents are intense, even physically graphic at times, reminiscent of the horror films directed by David Cronenberg.

As well as being scary, they also, avoiding spoilers, acknowledge the first two films in a clever and believable fashion.

With the restricted setting, creative plot and intense horror, The Cloverfield Paradox presents a mysterious and uneasy atmosphere similar to those in the original and 10 Cloverfield Lane.

The Characters

Ava, Michael’s wife, is the protagonist of the film. We learn in a few intimate scenes between her and Michael that they lost two children to a house fire. Throughout the film we are reminded of Ava’s unbearable grief as she watches home movies of her kids on numerous occasions. However, despite her outlandish position, once again avoiding spoilers, her grief is actually challenged in the plot. She’s very empathetic and the best character in the film.

David Oyelowo as Kiel, leading his fellow scientists out of the station itself [Credit: Paramount Pictures]
The other characters however are not as compelling or empathetic. This is The Cloverfield Paradox’s great weakness in my view. The supporting cast consist of well-known character archetypes that we’re all aware of and have seen before. Kiel is the tough, manly captain, Schmidt is the cynical, blunt scientist and Mundy (played by Chris O’Dowd of IT Crowd fame) is the charming, sarcastic comic relief. None of them are as compelling as Ava. They’re well written for what they are but in the first act a lot of time is spent establishing their personalities and showing them interacting with each other. The film seems to think that they’re more interesting than they actually are because these scenes get boring quite quickly.

Despite the boring archetypal characters however, The Cloverfield Paradox is a pretty decent sci-fi thriller with a very empathetic protagonist, atmospheric and visual horror, great executions of original ideas and an engaging story. It’s nothing ground-breaking and certainly not as brilliant as the first two but if you’re a Cloverfield fan or into sci-fi, I definitely recommend it.

I give The Cloverfield Paradox a solid 7 out of 10.  


You like cannibal movies? The Green Inferno (2013) Review

If you’re into cannibal films from the 70s’ and 80s’ then you’ll find plenty of enjoyment in The Green Inferno, however while other audiences may appreciate its plot and tension, they may find its tone problematic.

This 2013 film from Hostel and Cabin Fever director Eli Roth, concerns a group of students flying out to the Amazon to stop a company from logging the forest but when their plane suddenly crashes, the young students are kidnapped by a native tribe and subjected to their cannibalistic rituals.

The Green Inferno pic
Well? Do you?

The Plot

Even though most cannibal films are nothing but cheap, poorly written exploitation films, The Green Inferno’s script is very well done. The film begins at a very slow pace, building up tension as it establishes the characters and chronicles their journey to the jungle. It’s a while until the cannibals appear and when they do, it’s an intense and gruelling scene, all thanks to the script’s patient build up.

The tension doesn’t end there. In the tribe village, the group is held in a bamboo cage where, every day, one of them is taken out, ritually dismembered and eaten by the tribesmen. The knowledge that it is only a matter of time until you’re taken out and brutally murdered is terrifying. So as the group try to think of ways to escape, you feel their need and desperation. In this fashion The Green Inferno is like a prisoner-of-war camp film as the village is established as being heavily guarded. Hence when the students finally attempt to flee the village, it’s really intense.

Two members of the activist team following the crash [Credit: Universal Pictures]
Despite the good build up and setting, the plot begins to get very far-fetched towards the end of the film. Without getting into spoilers, the climax requires such a large suspension of disbelief, it decreased the tension I felt previously.

Still, for a cannibal film, The Green Inferno knows how to keep you engaged.

The Tone

Like the films it takes inspiration from, The Green Inferno has no problem in disgusting its audience. The scenes where the tribe dismember the students and eat their flesh are cringe inducing and feel very real. If the film stuck to this tone it would’ve created a more consistent and impactful experience. However, there are moments that are so over the top in terms of body horror that they become comedic. Whether they are intentional or not is unclear. For example, there is a scene where one of the students defecates in the cage. The other students turn away in disgust as sound effects of squirting faeces follow.

Amy is taken into the village [Credit: Universal Pictures]
Another example is later in the film, where one of the students breaks out from the cage and is caught by a crowd of tribesmen. The cannibals bite his neck and start to rip him apart with their bare hands like zombies. The gore is ridiculously graphic, similar to a scene from the original Dawn of the Dead. It’s completely unlike the gritty, realistic tone in the rest of the film.

Overall, despite its weak climax and inconsistent tone, The Green Inferno possesses some good tension and an engaging plot for the most part. If you like cannibal films then I certainly recommend it. If you’re into more traditional horror films however, you won’t miss a lot by not seeing it.

I give The Green Inferno a good 5 out of 10.

One More Thing Before 2018

2017 has been a challenging year.

For cinema, 2017 could’ve been better. I didn’t get around to seeing all the films I wanted such as Blade Runner 2049, Justice League and the Marvel films.

Colorful 2017 New Year date in sparklers

From the ones I did see however, I feel that 2017 has actually been a solid year. I saw some flawed but very entertaining films like Kong: Skull Island, Alien: Covenant and Star Wars: The Last Jedi. I also saw some decent films that, while had entertaining and memorable qualities, also had a significant number of flaws. These included Wonder Woman, War for the Planet of the Apes and The Disaster Artist.

The number of films I saw was so low, I didn’t think I had enough to compile a best and worst of the year list. However, I have chosen a single Best film of the year and Worst film of the year.

The Best film I saw in 2017 was It. The film’s visual horror and characters I thought were so well presented, it stood above everything else I saw this year.

‘The Losers Club’ in It [Credit: Warner Bros.]
The Worst film I saw in 2017 I disliked so much I didn’t even bother writing a review on it. That film was another horror called The Bye Bye Man. Its cliché antagonist, characters, plot and stupidly complicated mythology made the film a very testing watch.

Personally 2017 has been pretty pleasant. I finished my second year of University and have started my third and final year. I had a splendid holiday in Nerja Spain with my family. I turned 21 and had a fabulous party.

Creatively, 2017 has been a mixed bag.

Before writing this I read one more thing before 2017, my last post of 2016. In it I mentioned I was going through an existential crisis in terms of creativity. Unfortunately that crisis is continuing to this day. If you’ve been following this blog you’ve probably noticed that the frequency of content has been bumpy. I can have good periods where I post something every week or so, and I can have bad periods where I don’t post anything for months. I’ve spent most of 2017 thinking about my creativity, my passion, my desires and my motivations. It’s a difficult issue and I think it may take a while, but hopefully it’ll lead me somewhere. Somewhere better than where I am now.

Despite the crisis however, there has been some positives creatively. Getting Icesica uploaded took a huge weight off my conscious. In the past I’d have nightmarish thoughts about my hard drive breaking and losing Icesica forever, without having shown it to anyone. It’s good to know now that it’s finally out there for people to see.

I’m also proud of the four reviews I posted last Halloween. I hadn’t posted in a while at that point and I wasn’t sure if I could find the time and energy to crank out a review every week for a month. On top of that, each review was of a horror film I loved and I’d had to somehow convey years of personal analysis and feelings into a single post within a week. I’m happy that I came up with a rather ambitious plan and actually managed to carry it out successfully.

One of the films I reviewed this Halloween, ‘Candyman‘ [Credit: TriStar Pictures]
I’ve also put together a few videos on my YouTube channel that I’m proud of. Captain Sweden Strikes Again, the trailer I made for Icesica and the recent Captain Sweden are big highlights for me.

So what the hell is 2018 going to be like?

For cinema, it looks exciting with films like Pacific Rim: Uprising, Annihilation, Deadpool 2, Avengers: Infinity War and, most interestingly, Solo: A Star Wars Story.

Personally, I hope to get a good degree and have more new experiences.

Creatively I hope things get better. I hope to resolve this interior crisis. I have a lot of ideas for videos, reviews, stories and other things I want to make. It would be great if 2018 offered a start on those projects.

Wherever you are and whoever you are, I hope 2018 pleases you, reassures you and fulfils you. Have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.

I don’t know… Star Wars: The Last Jedi (2017) Review

I think whether Star Wars: The Last Jedi is good or bad purely depends on how you feel about the franchise at the moment. If you loved The Force Awakens and Rogue One and are hungry for more, then I think you’ll enjoy The Last Jedi.

If, however you’re hoping for a fresh and original Star Wars film, then you may have a mixed reaction to episode eight.

Me personally I feel that Star Wars should’ve ended after Return of the Jedi. Everything that came after I don’t think was necessary, they were really just produced for profit. There’s only one truly solid story that can be told in this universe and it’s already been done.

So while The Last Jedi does certainly contain some new drama and ideas, the film does still borrow a lot from the original trilogy.

Star Wars the last jedi pic
I hope I conveyed my uncertainty well for you all.

Rey, Kylo and Luke

The journeys these characters embark on in the film are fantastic. Picking up immediately from where The Force Awakens left off, The Last Jedi depicts Rey’s training dictated by her new master, Luke Skywalker. However, Luke is reluctant to teach Rey at first. We learn that Luke’s views on the Jedi has changed. This will be a spoiler-free review so I won’t go into specifics but I will state that Rey and Luke’s plot explores the moral perceptions of the Jedi. It’s the most compelling part of the film. I was leaning forward, quite close to the edge of my seat, every time they were on screen.

Rey (Daisy Ridley) stood before Jedi legend Luke Skywalker (Mark Hamill) [Credit: Lucasfilm Ltd.)
Kylo’s story is also quite compelling. Avoiding specifics again, Kylo is presented as the same villainous young Vader-wannabe as he is in The Force Awakens. However, like in The Force Awakens, there are instances where it seems Kylo is unsure of his position. The Last Jedi expands on this uncertainty, which makes the plot even more engaging because you never really know what Kylo’s position is.

Po, Finn and Rose

The plots regarding Po Dameron, Finn and his new friend Rose carry most of the film’s flaws, believability being one of them. As the resistance flee from the First Order, trying to escape their pursuit, there are a few moments that challenged my suspension of disbelief. Not only were they difficult to believe but they also got little development and attention after they occurred, making them seem even more unbelievable.

These plots, like The Force Awakens, borrow a lot of beats, ideas and imagery from the original trilogy, particularly from The Empire Strikes Back and even A New Hope towards the end. I was hoping the film would rely less on previous films for material as this is the second part of a brand-new trilogy and it still feels like we’re trapped in the world and scope of the original trilogy.

The AT-ATs return [Credit: Lucasfilm Ltd.]
As stated before, whether you will like The Last Jedi or not depends on your current feelings about the series. In my opinion, the film presents some solid new material and drama in the form of Rey’s training, Luke’s changed stance on the Jedi and Kylo’s moral uncertainty. However, it still rehashes beats from previous films and the plot gets very far-fetched occasionally.

If you want to see a completely new and fresh Star Wars film then I would lightly recommend The Last Jedi but if you want to see a more typical Star Wars film with the spirit of the original trilogy, then I highly recommend it.

I give The Last Jedi a good 8 out of 10.

Feeling Torn. The Disaster Artist (2017) Review

The Disaster Artist is a must-see for any fan of The Room. It is a great comedy that mocks the film’s flaws, recreates classic scenes and also an engaging drama that depicts its genesis. However, the structure and plot make the film less than what it could be.

The Disaster Artist pic

The Comedy

The humour is very meta as most of the jokes basically make fun of The Room. As the cast and crew are shooting, they are baffled by the script. They approach Tommy constantly, questioning issues like Denny’s age, Johnny laughing at Mark’s creepy story and the fact that Claudette’s breast cancer is only mentioned once. Their criticisms is very similar to those of most audiences, making the film very relatable and even more funny.

The crew watch in awe at their director at work [Credit: Warner Bros.]
Some humour comes from Tommy himself and how weird and arrogant he is. The depiction of Tommy Wiseau in The Disaster Artist seems to be a clear exaggeration of the Tommy that appears in the media. He’s a man with a vision who’s trying to blend into a culture that’s completely alien to him. So many great scenes spawn from this characterization. It can’t be said that Tommy is the funniest element in the film as the meta humour is still very strong. The truth is that both elements work tremendously and together they create a great comedic experience.

The Drama

The narrative is presented from Greg’s perspective, making him the protagonist. Even though he’s not as fun to watch as Tommy, he does have a desire and a weakness, which make him relatively empathetic. He dreams of becoming a Hollywood actor but his self-consciousness prevents him from performing convincingly.

That is until he meets Tommy, who teaches him how to be fearless when performing. This leads to a friendship that acts as a strong foundation for the drama. As hilariously weird Tommy is, we see that to Greg he’s almost a brother. I think their relationship is one of the big highlights of the film, especially when we witness their struggle to break into the industry.

While Tommy is presented as an oblivious clown, he is given some humanization. He wants to act, create, express himself but his look, accent and attitude detract the big Hollywood producers. His characterization and past may not be understood but his passion and desire certainly are. As Tommy tries to make it in Hollywood, he is rejected by numerous drama teachers and producers, each one more vicious than the previous. This makes for some legitimately hurtful scenes as we see Tommy depressed and discouraged by his failures.

The Structure and Plot

I thought that the way the film chronicled the shooting and production felt very incomplete. The Disaster Artist essentially presents a series of scenes of the cast and crew shooting specific sequences from The Room, which while very funny, feel quite random. The shoot is a subplot that doesn’t really have a plot. It just starts, has a bit of conflict and then ends all of a sudden. I think there needed to be more tension, the goal of the shoot had to be made clear so that there could be an engaging plot with escalating adversity.

There’s also a major plot hole that I couldn’t get out of my mind. As Greg and Tommy are shooting, their relationship crumbles. Greg becomes increasingly more offended by Tommy’s direction and choices, yet he continues to act in the film. Why doesn’t he quit if he can’t stand the production? I’m sure this is addressed in the book of the same name but it’s never dealt with in the film. It’s a significant flaw that seriously affected my engagement in the plot.

Overall, the structure and plot could’ve been a lot stronger however the comedy, the drama and the clear attention to detail when recreating The Room, is good enough for me to recommend it.

I give The Disaster Artist a good 6 out of 10.

A New Holiday Favourite. Krampus (2015) Review

If you’re comfortable with the usual holiday favourites like Elf and It’s a Wonderful Life, then I suggest you avoid the film I’m about to review. However, if you want to see something original and have a dark sense of humour, then please continue reading this review of 2015’s Krampus.

This horror comedy revolves around the dysfunctional Engel family, trying celebrate the holiday season but when their squabbling breaks young Max’s Christmas spirit, Krampus (the Satan to St Nicholas’s God) appears. What follows is a brutal and ridiculous fight for survival as the family try to defend themselves from Krampus and his army of helpers.

Krampus pic
Even if you hate horror comedies, hopefully this photo of me smiling holding a thumb up will persuade you to watch this one.

The Comedy

I think the humour in Krampus, while dark and cynical, is very well done. The Engel Family are a divided and conflicted clan who’re trying to celebrate a holiday that embraces love and unity. Max’s half (which consist of him, his parents and sister) come across as the traditional American family. They take Santa photos, bake cookies and possess very liberal values. The other half however (which consist of Max’s aunt Linda, her husband, three children and great aunt) are rough, pro-gun southerners.

Max’s mother, Sarah (Toni Collette), prepares for the arrival of her sister’s family [Credit: Universal Pictures]
The film displays Christmas as a time of tension and tolerance rather than of love and giving as the two groups try get along but their flaws and quirks make it impossible. This results in some very amusing scenes. A good example is when Linda’s clan arrive at Max’s house as they barge in with homemade food and a bulldog called Rosie.

In addition to the cynical character-driven comedy, Krampus features some zany humour in the form of Krampus’ helpers. They consist of killer gingerbread men and teddy bears with razor sharp teeth. The helpers add a fantastical wacky charm to the film, similar to that of Gremlins and Leprechaun. The zany comedy contrasts nicely with the cynical humour and horror.

A burning gingerbread man leaps to attack [Credit: Universal Pictures]

The Horror

Speaking of horror, while the quirky creatures and cynical humour make Krampus a mostly amusing experience, the film is a horror comedy and certainly has its scary moments. Not all of Krampus’ helpers are cute as his army also includes a flying angel doll and a giant worm-like jack-in-the-box, both are very creepy.

When we first see the jack-in-the-box creature, it is swallowing a child whole like an anaconda. When it swallows, it releases a disgustingly monstrous roar. Not long after, we are introduced to the angel as the parents find it resting on a plank in the attic like an owl. It immediately swoops down and attacks Max’s mother, revealing a slimy tongue and a pair of ghostly doll eyes.

Subtler horror comes in the form of Krampus himself. Unlike the angel and jack-in-the-box, Krampus is kept in the shadows for most of the film. Only his horns, hooves and overall silhouette are shown at first, however the power and damage he’s capable of is conveyed clearly. Using the same method films like Alien and Candyman utilized, Krampus immediately establishes the consequences of the monster but reveals the monster itself gradually, engaging and disturbing the viewer.

Max meets the legend himself [Credit: Universal Pictures]

The Message

With the cynical, wacky humour and intense horror, you’d think Krampus was an anti-Christmas film, showing gore and cynicism for the sake of showing gore and cynicism. However, when considering Max’s story and the film’s ending (which I will not spoil), Krampus is very Christmassy in terms of values. Without giving too much away, I theorize that the film argues Christmas can be a difficult time as you must perform acts of kindness and love in a world where acts of hatred and greed are the norm, but is still a holiday worth believing in and fighting for.

Overall, with its blend of dark, cartoony humour and shocking, suspenseful horror, I think Krampus is one of the best Christmas films I’ve ever seen and I highly recommend it.

I give Krampus an outstanding 10 out of 10.


One of the Greatest Horror Films I’ve Ever Seen. Candyman (1992) Review

You know you’ve been affected by a piece of art when you constantly need to revisit it and find new things in every viewing. Sometimes art stays with you because of its mystery, your continuous struggle to determine what the piece means. I have experienced this with quite a few films, Candyman is one of them.

Every time I watch it, I get a new angle on its narrative. I cannot say objectively what the film is about. So in this review, as a conclusion to Halloween 2017, I am going to simply state my current theories and why I think Candyman is an incredible film.

Candyman Pic
This was an emotional watch.

The premise of this 1992 horror concerns a graduate student, Helen Lyle, researching urban legends in Cabrini-Green Chicago for her thesis. The focus of her investigation is a legend known as Candyman, a boogeyman with a hook for a hand who appears when you say his name five times before a mirror. After a series of brutal and unexplained events, Helen begins to question whether the Candyman is just a myth or something far more real.

Philip Glass and the Atmosphere

The horror in Candyman is subtler than in most horror films. While there are some gory scenes, most of the film’s horror manifests in its atmosphere. The affect Candyman has on the community socially is just as disturbing as the Candyman himself.

We see graffiti art depicting the Candyman in a monstrous style. We hear eerie stories about Cabrini residents hearing something “coming through the walls”, calling the police and not being believed. We hear even more gruesome stories about the Candyman mutilating children in public toilets. The film introduces us to the idea of the Candyman and what he does to his victims, which creates a lot of tension because when you first see him, there’s a notorious reputation and backstory in your head.

This grim, eerie atmosphere is expressed beautifully by Philip Glass’ soundtrack. If you’ve read any of my other reviews, you’ll notice that I rarely comment on a film’s technical qualities (cinematography, editing, soundtrack) but in Candyman the score is so incredible I can’t ignore it. With an operatic choir and organ, Glass creates music that conveys the huge, god-like devastation the Candyman myth has caused in the community. The soundtrack will never leave you.


As I stated before, I can’t say what the film is about with certainty. My thoughts change with each viewing. However, I think I can say with some confidence that Candyman does comment on the American class system. I’m not the only one who thinks this, there’re quite a few reviews and articles online that share a similar opinion.

Helen (Virginia Madsen) is held captive by the Candyman (Tony Todd) [Credit: TriStar Pictures]
This is one of the main qualities of Candyman that makes it so unique and affective compared to most horror films. Its horror is based heavily in reality. The film depicts an African American community being terrorized by an unknown force and receiving no aid from the authorities. I think the Candyman symbolizes the American criminal, the drug lord, the little tyrant that was able to take over the town because the authorities couldn’t be bothered to intervene.

The more Helen denies his existence, the stronger he becomes because that’s how tyrants thrive. From the ignorance of the higher powers. This stems into a harrowing plot where Helen tries everything to reject and reason with the Candyman.

The story of a monster terrorizing a small community due to the ignorance of authorities I think can be applied to any crime ridden area in the states or anywhere in the world. However, to see the story executed so maturely and atmospherically in a horror film I think is very rare.

I have no doubt the next time I watch the film I’ll have more theories, some of them could be expansions of the ones I just shared or they could be completely different. My point is, Candyman conveys ideas and feelings unlike any other film I’ve seen. It’s been around for over two decades and it still has an impact, so I encourage everyone to give it a watch.

I give Candyman an outstanding 10 out of 10.


UPDATE: If you’re a fan of zombies and theatre, then I’ve got the show for you! Some friends of mine are doing a stage version of Night of the Living Dead called No More Room In Hell in Sunderland.


If you’re in the area please drop by and give the show a watch. You’ll be in for some great performances by some fantastic actors! Check here for info on dates and tickets.